What's greener?

What's greener? Real vs fake Xmas trees

Dr Michelle Dickinson

Tags christmas , xmas

GI-7-Whats-greener-Real-vs-fake-Xmas-trees-700x400
Ever wondered which kind of tree is kinder at Christmas? Dr Michelle Dickinson investigates.

Real

thumb-up

Carbon footprint equals 3.13kg of CO2

thumb-down

Fertilisers and pesticides can be used heavily in non-organic tree farms

thumb-up

Absorbs nitrogen from the soil and CO2 and methane from the air during its 6-8 years of life

thumb-up

Biodegradable, and has lower greenhouse gas emissions if composted rather than burned after Christmas

Fake

thumb-down

Carbon footprint equals 18.6kg of CO2

thumb-down

Made from non-renewable materials (polyvinylchloride [PVC], polypropylene [PP] and steel) which are difficult to separate for recycling so end up in landfill

thumb-up

If you keep it for eight years or more, it has less environmental impact than eight live trees

thumb-up

Convenient and easy to maintain

The verdict

Natural trees are the obvious green option – and nothing says Christmas like the smell of a freshly cut pine! Remember, try to buy local to save on transport costs – and if you want to light up your tree, consider using low energy or even solar-powered LED lights.

Another green option is to buy a live potted pine tree which can be brought inside and decorated during Christmas, then put outside for the rest of the year. And if that sounds too hard, remember that a fake tree is just as green if you can keep it for eight years or more!

 

Have an eco dilemma that needs expert advice? Email [email protected] with ‘My dilemma’ in the subject line, or write to Green Ideas, PO Box 47177, Ponsonby, Auckland 1144.